AI - LLM with Vulnerability Detection

LLM with Vulnerability Detection

• LLM with Vulnerability Detection
  • overall
  • Vulnerability Detection using Large Language Models

---

overall

Motivation

• Vulnerability detection is a very critical task for systems security.

• Current analysis techniques suffer from the trade-off between coverage and accuracy.

• ML-based analysis tools are non-robust, black-box and unreliable to use in real-world ¹.

• LLMs demonstrate revolutionizing capabilities for programming language-related tasks but they are also studied in a black-box fashion for both vulnerability detection and its repair.

Security experts follow a step-by-step approach for vulnerability detection. Can using the same approach help LLMs performing better at the vulnerability detection task?

Vulnerability Detection using Large Language Models

Step-by-Step Vulnerability Detection using Large Language Models ²

Objective

• Design a framework to emulate step-by-step reasoning process of a human security expert using LLMs, to efficiently detect vulnerabilities in source code.

Methodology

• uses few-shot in-context learning to guide LLMs to follow a step-by-step human-like reasoning model for vulnerability detection.
• make sure that the model first generates chain-of-thought reasoning ³ and then makes a decision based on that reasoning (Figure 1 and 3b).

Visualizing the Process of Vulnerability Detection

• the behavior of an LLM when it is asked to detect a vulnerability in two different scenarios.
  • First, when it is asked to give a direct answer (Figure 3a);
  • second, when it is first asked to perform human-expert like reasoning and then make a decision (Figure 3b).
• We choose GPT-3.5 as an LLM and a code snip- pet containing an out-of- bound write vulnerability as a running example.

Evaluation

• it shows that step-by-step reasoning guides the LLM to detect the (CWE-787) vulnerability.
• To systematically evaluate this approach, we create our own diverse synthetic dataset based on a subset of the MITRE 2022 top 25 most dangerous vulnerabilities.
• For each vulnerability we create vulnerable examples and their patches with varying levels of complexity.
• We use the ‘gpt-3.5-turbo-16k’ chat API to compare our approach with SoTA tools (Table 1).

Takeaway

• Following a human-like step-by-step reasoning approach helps LLMs to efficiently analyze code and detect vulnerabilities.
• Our approach provides an explanation for the detected vulnerabilities, which helps user to better contextualize them and to find their root cause.
• Systematic evaluation of this approach on real-world datasets is still required to determine its reliability in real-world use cases.

1. DanielArp,ErwinQuiring,FeargusPendlebury,AlexanderWarnecke,andFabioPierazzi. Dos and don’ts of machine learning in computer security, 2021. ↩

2. https://www.bu.edu/peaclab/files/2023/08/USENIX_23_Poster.pdf ↩

3. JasonWei,XuezhiWang,DaleSchuurmans,MaartenBosma,BrianIchter,FeiXia,EdChi,QuocLe,andDennyZhou. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models, 2023. ↩